There are many questions about the attacks on Mumbai and the Pak Alert Press has an extensive list of articles concerning the terroist siege of Mumbai, India, with article excerpts which include eye witness accounts and alternate reports on who, what, and when.
The articles come from a variety of sources, including local papers and Britain's The Guardian.
Did all the terroists arrive by boat? Were they already staying at Nariman House? Were they fair-skinned? Some are reported killed, one in custody, but where are they rest of the '14' terroists?
'Mumbai attacks like 9/11' rhetoric aside, the aftermath is being treated or subjected to the same type of alternate-story clouding as the attacks of 9/11/01 were with resulting confusion over whether Mumbai was an inside job - a false flag op - or somehow state-sponsored or enabled.
4 comments:
Please!! the Mumbai attacks are being treated to the same alternative analysis because the story as presented makes absolutely no sense at all. The only thing that cannot be disbuted are the bodies and those people left bleeding and terrorized. Since last weekend I have been saying "this makes no sense at all" and then when we were told that all this was accomplished by 10 young people I began to whoop as I have been doing since 1967 when someone raised my consciousness about the JFK murder.
Nariman House.
Am in complete agreement with you here, clymela, thanks! jude
standrewsgirl, thanks for the catch - it's been de-typo'd now Thanks to you.
If memory serves, the name 'Harriman' has two 'rr's and I was reading last evening about the Trilateral Commission, CFR, etc, and came across a name heard many x during my childhood: Avril Harriman.
Would you guess he was born in April?
Thanks again, jude
Hi Jude,
I was also reading about roots of the Trilateral Commission, CFR, etc. and was wondering if you have blogged more about the word Columbia with it's ancient roots.
DD
Post a Comment